The Q Document/The Synoptic Gospels - Wikibooks, open books for an open world
The questions that arise about the literary relationships between the Synoptic Gospels concern both the differences as well as the similarities. Comparing and Contrasting the Three Synoptic Gospels some just between Mark and Matthew, and the fewest just between Mark and Luke. Most scholars take these observations as a strong clue to the literary relationship among the synoptics and Mark's special place.
It is quite possible then that even as a young man he took to writing down his own experiences  as well as the teachings of Jesus and the events of His life as they were recounted in his home by the first-hand witnesses—including Peter—who gathered there.
As these records were being gathered from different people at different times, they may also have been written down in Aramaic, Greek, Hebrew, or even a mixture of these. Because of his broad familiarity with the teachings of Jesus, perhaps his own personal experience with the Lord especially during the week of His passion, his ability to read and write Greek, and perhaps having already compiled the material for what we know as his gospel account, it is not surprising that Mark would be prevailed upon by his cousin Barnabas to join him together with Paul on their first missionary journey as their helper Acts Neither is it surprising that we should find him returning to Cyprus with Barnabas Acts At least partly based upon the statement of Peter in 1Pe 5: To summarize then, it is reasonable to understand from the many similarities of the synoptic gospels that there is a literary relationship between them.
This no doubt had a profound, life-changing effect upon him and his family. At an early date he began compiling these events in written form both for his own benefit and to share with others. The eyewitnesses themselves who surrounded him, including Peter, bore witness to the events he was recording to share with others, and because Mark had the education and means to do so, they perhaps even encouraged him in the task.
Matthew and Luke, writing independently of one another, made use of what Mark had already compiled, but expanded upon it with additional information available to them.
File:Relationship between synoptic gospels.png
The availability of medications provided by companies is no doubt a contributing aspect to prescription drug abuse epidemic. Some medicines are commonly used to treat various types of bacteria, such as gonorrhea and infections of the throat. No doubts, you have to check with your soundness care provider to see whether one of these medicaments is a right choice for you. This material is known as the double tradition.John Piper - How should you deal with the differences in the Synoptic Gospels?
About one-fifth of the material in the synoptic gospels taken together would be considered "double tradition" material. Additionally, each gospel has some material that is unique to it alone.
Identical wording is rendered in red. The gospels often recount the stories, usually in the same exact order, sometimes even using the exact same words. Some sections are repeated nearly verbatim.
The Synoptic Problem: The Literary Relationship of Matthew, Mark, and Luke
Scholars note that the similarities between the Mark, Matthew, and Luke are too great to be accounted for by mere coincidences. Since multiple eyewitnesses reporting the exact same events will basically never relate a story using exactly the same word-for-word telling, Scholars and theologians have long assumed there was some literary relationship between the three synoptic gospels.
The precise nature of the relationships between the gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke is know as the Synoptic Problem. The recognition of the question, and attempts to resolve it, date to antiquity.
- The Gospels and The Synoptic Problem
- Synoptic Gospels