Predator - prey - negative feedback - stable population - vertebrates.v. invertebrates - density dependent factors (Serengeti) - density independent factors. Evolution home. Predator-Prey Relationships. A predator is an organism that eats another organism. The prey is the organism which the predator eats. Apr 6, In ecology, predation is a mechanism of population control. Thus, when the number of predators is scarce the number of preys should rise.
This includes predator-prey, herbivore-plant, and parasite-host interactions. These linkages are the prime movers of energy through food chains. They are an important factor in the ecology of populations, determining mortality of prey and birth of new predators. Predation is an important evolutionary force: Predation is widespread and easy to observe. Neither its existence nor its importance is in doubt.
The Development of Predation Theory Mathematical models of predation are amongst the oldest in ecology. The Italian mathematician Volterra is said to have developed his ideas about predation from watching the rise and fall of Adriatic fishing fleets. When fishing was good, the number of fishermen increased, drawn by the success of others.
After a time, the fish declined, perhaps due to over-harvest, and then the number of fishermen also declined. After some time, the cycle repeated.
Linx chasing Hare The idea that a coupled system of predator and prey would cycle gained further support from analyses of fur trapping records of the Hudson's Bay Company.
The number of furs purchased at the Company's forts was meticulously recorded, for well over years. An analysis of the numbers of snowshoe hares, and one of their main predators, the lynx, provides a remarkable record of a predator-prey cycle. Peaks and valleys can be easily observed at roughly year intervals.
Logic and mathematical theory suggest that when prey are numerous their predators increase in numbers, reducing the prey population, which in turn causes predator number to decline. The prey population eventually recovers, starting a new cycle.
T Paramecium, which also proved useful in test-tube studies of competition, was placed in culture with a predaceous protozoan.
These laboratory studies found that cycles were short-lived, and the system soon collapsed. However, if one added more paramecium every few days, the expected cycle was observed. These results suggested that the predator-prey system was inherently self-annihilating without some outside immigration.
The question then arose: Observing that frequent additions of paramecium produced predator-prey cycles in a test-tube led to the idea that in a physically heterogeneous world, there would always be some pockets of prey that predators happened not to find and eliminate. Perhaps when the predator population declined, having largely run out of prey, these remaining few could set off a prey rebound.
Spatial heterogeneity in the environment might have a stabilizing effect.
- Predator–Prey Relationships
- 10 Dumbfounding Examples of Predator-Prey Relationships
- Predation & herbivory
The top right image shows the domed shell of a tortoise. The bottom left image shows the pink, bell-shaped flowers of a foxglove. The bottom right image shows a millipede curled into a ball.
For instance, the crab spider has the coloration and body shape of a flower petal, which makes it very hard to see when it's standing still against the background of a real flower. Can you even see it in the picture below? It took me a minute! Another famous example is the chameleon, which can change its color to match its surroundings. Both of these are examples of camouflage, or avoiding detection by blending in with the background.
For example, the strawberry poison dart frog shown below has bright coloration to warn predators that it is toxic, while the striped skunk, Mephitis mephitis, uses its bold pattern of stripes to warn predators of the unpleasant odor it produces. Left image shows a bright red frog sitting on a leaf. Right image shows a skunk. Predators that ignore this coloration and eat the organism will experience the bad taste or toxic chemicals may learn not to eat the species in the future.
This type of defensive mechanism is called aposematic coloration, or warning coloration. Some species have evolved to mimic, or copy, another species' aposematic coloration—though they themselves may not be bad-tasting or toxic. In Batesian mimicry, a harmless species imitates the warning coloration of a harmful one. If they share the same predators, this coloration protects the harmless species, even though its members do not actually have the physical or chemical defenses of the organism they mimic.
For example, many nonvenomous, non-stinging insect species mimic the coloration of wasps or bees.
For example, the figure below shows pairs of foul-tasting butterflies that share similar coloration. Once a predator encounters either member of the pair and discovers its unpleasant taste, it is likely to avoid both species in the future. This similar appearance could have been evolutionarily favored because when members of the two species looked more similar, both would have tended to get eaten at lower rates—thanks to the protection provided by a predator learning to avoid either. This lizard abovecamoflauges by blending with the lichen on rocks, while the tortoise belowhas a hard shell to deter would-be predators.
TPWD: Predator-Prey Relationship -- Young Naturalist
In this snowy environment, the polar bear is white to avoid being noticed as it approaches the seal, and the seal pup is white to avoid being noticed by the bear. The fastest lions are able to catch food and eat, so they survive and reproduce, and gradually, faster lions make up more and more of the population.
The fastest zebras are able to escape the lions, so they survive and reproduce, and gradually, faster zebras make up more and more of the population. An important thing to realize is that as both organisms become faster to adapt to their environments, their relationship remains the same: This is true in all predator-prey relationships.