"A celebration of Britain's relationship with Israel" - Globes
It's not clear what damaged the “special relationship” between the United Just like the British, Israelis are convinced they have a deep and. The future UK monarch's historic trip boosted Israel's international legitimacy, but also underlined the world's ongoing discomfort with Jewish sovereignty. Britain has a special relationship with Israel that is little recognised in the mainstream media but unmissable in light of the killings in Gaza.
This follows naval exercises between Britain and Israel in December and November Through its blockade, the Israeli navy restricts Palestinians' fishing rights, even firing on local fishermen.
The blockade of Gaza is widely regarded as illegal, including by senior UN officialsa UN independent panel of experts and Amnesty Internationalpartly since it inflicts "collective punishment" on an entire population.
Little is known of the intelligence relationship between the UK and Israel. There have been differences such as in when prime minister Margaret Thatcher ordered a freeze in relations with Mossad after a female Israeli agent lured Mordechai Vanunu, who was trying to reveal Israel's nuclear secrets, to Rome where he was kidnapped.
"A celebration of Britain's relationship with Israel"
As the mandatory power in Palestine from toBritain enabled the gradual takeover of Palestine by the Zionist movement Former MI6 director Sir Richard Dearlove recently said that British intelligence did not always share information with Israel "because we could never guarantee how the intelligence might or would be used".
But the Telegraph reports that the relationship between MI6 and Mossad has become closer in recent years with both concerned about nuclear proliferation in Iran.
The director of the British spy centre GCHQ says the latter has a "strong partnership with our Israeli counterparts in signals intelligence" and that "we are building on an excellent cyber relationship with a range of Israeli bodies".
The interceptions took place just three weeks before Israel's offensive on Gaza in Januarysuggesting that they may have helped Israel gear up for the offensive. Britain completely opposes the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions BDS movement and rejects imposing even the most basic sanctions on Israel, such as travel bans on those involved in expanding illegal settlements.
Indeed, the government appears to be helping Israel counter the BDS movement. Rather, the UK wants trade relations to go from " strength to strength ", bolstering the UK's position as the primary Israeli investment location in Europe.
Israel–United Kingdom relations
Yet this is meaningless in light of actual British policy, which is never known to press Israel strongly to end settlement building or the occupation. The UK simply calls on Israel to "ease" restrictions on Gaza, and rather than demand an Israeli withdrawal from the occupied Golan Heights, Britain only calls on Israel to "uphold its obligations under international law". Hundreds of millions of dollars' worth of goods produced in these settlements are exported internationally each year, including oranges, dates and spring water.
Palestinian youths wanting to play football in the Maale Adumim settlement in the Israeli-occupied West Bank seen in the background are blocked by Israeli security forces as they try to enter the settlement in October AFP Yet Britain permits this trade and does not even keep a record of imports into the UK from the settlements. Indeed, Boris Johnson has explicitly said that it is the "policy of the UK" to trade with the illegal settlements and that this will continue.
This policy violates UN Security Council resolutions which require all states to "distinguish, in their relevant dealings, between the territory of the State of Israel and the territories occupied since ".
What explains British policy? Britain has a long history of supporting Israeli aggression. As the mandatory power in Palestine from toBritain enabled the gradual takeover of Palestine by the Zionist movement. When the Arab revolt against Britain and its Zionist proteges broke out in the late s, the British army brutally crushed it.
Two reasons are clear in explaining current British policy. The other is that UK policy towards Israel is to a large degree determined in Washington and by London wanting to curry favour with the US and not challenge its closest ally.
But British policy goes beyond this.
Patel was forced to resign last year after it was revealed that she held secret meetings in Israel with key officials, including Netanyahu. Most significantly, she visited Israeli military hospitals in the Golan Heights where Israel treats anti-government fighters involved in the Syrian war, including members of the al-Qaeda affiliate al-Nusra, which Israel is seen as effectively supporting.
Patel even wanted to give British aid to the Israeli army. London increasingly regards Israel as a strategic asset, especially now that the old Arab-Israeli conflict has largely disappeared, meaning that Britain can more easily back both Israel and its despotic Arab allies at the same time. Is Israel doing all the provoking?
It is certainly sending a very strong message to Tehran to think again. Iran sees Israel's actions in Syria as provocative.
Israel is opposed to Iran's growing military role on its border. I'm not sure about active "backing". Britain is certainly unhappy about Iran's wider regional role and concerned about its nuclear ambitions.
Unlike the US, it wants to stick with the nuclear deal. I think all major governments and international institutions will want to avoid a major regional conflagration between Israel and Iran.
We strongly support Israel's right to defend itself. Is there a defined red line for Israel and Iran, and if so, where? Israel's red lines up to now have been related to the transfer of advanced weaponry by Iran to Hezbollah in Lebanon. It has attacked arms convoys and weapons dumps. It is concerned about more accurate long-range missiles, sophisticated anti-ship and anti-armour weapons reaching the Shia militia. Now, though, things have moved on - Iranian forces are now establishing themselves in Syria - and by the scale and scope of its strikes on Wednesday night, Israel is saying that enough is enough.
Effectively, these Iranian forces are a long way from home and should go back to Tehran! Israeli military spokesmen insist that all the 70 or so targets they hit on Wednesday night were core Iranian Revolutionary Guard installations - not pro-Iran militias or proxy forces.
UK-Israel relations | The Times of Israel
Are there talks between Israel and Iran on any level? I would be surprised if there were any direct contacts at all. Others may act as intermediaries - Russia for example - but the "message" from Israel to Iran has clearly been delivered in a more direct way.
In the days of the Shah, Israel was a close ally of Iran.