Government initiatives to reduce poverty and crime relationship

24 ways to reduce crime in the world’s most violent cities | Working in development | The Guardian

government initiatives to reduce poverty and crime relationship

Avoid repressive policies: Many countries have approached the that show poverty and violence do not have a direct correlation. governments and start focusing on private and personal security, stop using public spaces. Implementation of anti-crime initiatives - the crime situation in South Africa lead aims to eradicate municipal infrastructure backlogs in poor communities to ensure South Africa has relations within southern Africa, on the continent of Africa. Poverty reduction, or poverty alleviation, is a set of measures, both economic and humanitarian, Aid and government support in health, education, and infrastructure helps growth by .. In addition to engendering poverty and poverty interventions, a correlation between Poverty · Economic reforms · Crime prevention.

government initiatives to reduce poverty and crime relationship

Similarly, the respondents suggested multiple factors that may helpful to reduce poverty incidence in a country, including, investment in public goods, entrepreneurial education, technical education, subsidize farmers, tax reduction, employment generation, loans disbursement to the poor with free interest, etc.

Figure 2 shows the different factors that helpful to reduce crime rates and poverty incidence in a country.

Figure 1 Causal mechanism between crime and poverty. Figure 2 Factors affecting for crime and poverty reduction in a country. The next question asked about whether government policies sufficient to reduce crime rates and poverty incidence in a country. The total respondents given answer negatively while 70 respondents agreed that government strive hard to combat poverty and crime rate in a country.

The final question is related with individual participation in the economy by controlling poverty and crime rate. Share via Email A focus on certain groups such as young males between years old can help to reduce violence. We need to use campaigns and technology to reach every child and family in these countries. We need to develop those tools to make sure that everybody feels important and cared for through parenting interventions, family interventions, wellbeing campaigns, and early childhood education.

Anilena Mejia, research fellow, The University of QueenslandBrisbane, Australia Latin America leads world on murder map, but key cities buck deadly trend Read more Localise programmes: During the 90s in Rio we had rates of homicide that would go beyond epidemic levels over percitizens.

But we need also accompany this with other measures — urban upgrading, better urban planning, situational prevention — especially early childhood intervention. While people are aware that there are high levels of lethal violence in Brazil, this is often misrepresented by national and international media as a simple cops vs robbers dynamic — a misrepresentation that more often than not criminalises poverty.

Crime-poverty nexus: an intellectual survey

Much more work needs to be done on understanding the official and unofficial social, political and economic structures that sustain these high levels. In this respect, it should be noted that the most successful initiatives launched by local authorities on their own with or without outside support have either provided the model for the formulation of a national program, or were actually transferred to the central level and mandated to work nationally. This outstanding program gave rise to a national program with the same title under the Department of Human Settlements.

The program received wide international recognition for its unparalleled achievements, having improved 11, hectares of slums and reaching 15 million people over the past three decades. Their functional efficiency is key to national prosperity, and they receive a large share of public investments to support and enhance their production capacity and their competitiveness in a globalized economy.

Megacities and larger urban centers exhibit sharp contrasts in the quality of their urban environment, reflecting the disparities in income and wealth that characterize different regions and provinces, as well as the nation as a whole.

Because they concentrate wealth and opportunity, they are magnets attracting migratory flows from economically depressed areas, and across national borders from the surrounding countries. The influx of migrants swells the ranks of poor and marginalized populations living in slums and informal settlements. Unplanned urban expansion often spills over jurisdictional boundaries into adjacent smaller municipalities, overwhelming their managerial and financial capacities.

Addressing the needs of slum dwellers, including migrants and floating populations, is part of the national social and political agenda.

It is also a critical component of local economic and social development strategies. Operationalizing these strategies in larger urban centers requires structures adapted to the scale of the city and the magnitude of the challenge.

The program implemented by Sao Paulo illustrates the difficulties entailed by this effort. It has to cope with inequities in access to land and services which have led to the proliferation of squatter settlements and the marginalization of vulnerable groups.

Housing construction and improvement in areas close to employment nodes. Rehabilitation of the historic center. The secretariat is working on slum upgrading in 30 slums, and has approximately 31, dwelling units under construction or renovation.

The plan relies on community participation and empowerment and is based on five fundamental principles: The social right to a decent home. Democratic access to city space. Participation of civil society in municipal decision-making and management.

The right to secure occupancy of land in settled areas. The priority of lower income households in the allocation of public resources and subsidies. The social housing program has been redirected to focus on resettling households living in environmentally hazardous zones, providing relocation dwellings to families displaced through slum upgrading activities, and the extension of infrastructure to unserviced zones. Over 5, families have received new housing under programs funded through the Municipal Housing Fund, state and federal programs, and external sources.

To target the most vulnerable groups in an objective and transparent manner, SEHAB partnered with the Center for Metropolitan Studies to develop a spatial and statistical database covering more than two thousand slums wherehouseholds accounting for 1.

Mapping multi-dimensional indicators of social exclusion allows the city to target the communities with the highest unemployment and poverty rates, the lowest educational levels, the most inadequate access to public services, and the highest rate of crime and children at risk.

The program aims to improve slums and deteriorated areas and integrate them as neighborhoods in the city with secure land occupancy, adequate access to services and community facilities, improved urban environment, and landscaped open space and recreation areas.

Priority is given to the designated special zones of social interest ZEIS of which have been delineated to date. The action program includes three key components: Development of housing and urban action plans at the district level: The plans combine the technical and financial resources of the different municipal departments, leverages local resources by obtaining funding from the state and federal governments as well as external sources including the Inter-American Development Bank, and includes NGOs as partners.

Priority is given to districts where CBOs are well organized and actively involved in social issues, including control of urban violence. The program acts through land regularization, improved access to infrastructure and public services, provision of new housing and community facilities, and social projects. Fostering resident participation in planning and decision-making, and ensuring community approval at every stage of the program and its different activities, is viewed as a fundamental component of the strategy and the cornerstone of its success.

Transparency and trust are preconditions to community support for the program, and for participation by CBOs in the maintenance of infrastructure and public space and the physical and social management of the upgraded neighborhood. Regularization of occupancy in informal settlements on publicly owned land and in unauthorized subdivisions: Insettlements had been regularized benefiting 40, families. In Aprilthe President of Brazil announced the creation of a housing fund of 5.

Crime-poverty nexus: an intellectual survey

The fund also will provide credit for housing improvement. Several financial instruments ranging from micro-loans to assisted loans will be available to lower and middle-income families.

This fund will make an important contribution to social equity and the improvement of living conditions for the poorer segments of the population. The Expanding Scope of Partnerships in Local Government Initiatives In slums and squatter settlements, sustained demand for infrastructure, particularly water, has led the drive for security of tenure and access to services. Local government response has been conditioned by statutory powers, local politics, and especially the forcefulness and political potency of the various public, private, NGO, and community actors operating through formal and informal channels on the local scene.

Their ability to collaborate with these different actors is a key factor in their effectiveness at structuring programs that can significantly improve the lives of slum dwellers. The range of partners involved in local authority-driven initiatives has grown in parallel with decentralization and the expanding scope of local responsibilities.

While performance has sometimes been marred by mismanagement and excessive politicization, the best-governed local governments are taking bold decisions, negotiating with communities and social movements and advocacy groups, entering into agreements with strategic partners, and instituting innovative practices.

As they move away from promises and projects motivated by electoral tactics to strategies and action plans formulated through participatory processes, local authorities become far more effective in addressing the needs of slum dwellers.

Partnerships, multisectoral strategies, and integrated mutually reinforcing initiatives are the key features of successful programs. The Comunidades program in Fortaleza, Brazil, was a leader in structuring partnerships integrating state and municipal government, NGOs, CBOs, and local stakeholders as full partners to simultaneously improve the lives of favela residents, guide the expansion of the urbanized area, and offer socially, economically, and environmentally adapted models for the settlement of poor households.

Fortaleza, the capital of Ceara State, has a population of 2. The inability of housing and slum upgrading programs to keep up with migration from rural areas fueled their proliferation at the rate of one new favela emerging every month. To date, more than 11, units have been built by their future occupants. In addition, a social assistance program called PROAFA has been a factor in engaging favela communities in the development effort. In the Municipality of Fortaleza and the popular council of Rondon district with support from international donors, signed a partnership agreement to develop a strategic approach to address the challenge of uncontrolled urbanization and poverty.

The concept focused on the development of strategically located micro-settlements to draw urbanization in desired directions. Their planned location near very poor favelas brings badly needed services to the peri-urban fringe. They create nodes offering an alternative pattern of urbanization affordable to lower income populations through community-based methods of development.

The success of the pilot project housing 50 lower income families led the state government to support expanding this initiative. The statewide Comunidades program structures an interface for coordinated action among the key stakeholders involved in urban development. The process capitalizes on the complementary roles of NGOs with the capacity to innovate and lead outreach and mobilization efforts, and the public authorities that can foster institutionalization and replication of successful actions.

The program has three strategic objectives: Comunidades is managed by a special commission the Integration Councilwhich includes two representatives of each of the partners involved: The council prepares the work plan, coordinates public, private, and community inputs and gives the community a voice in the allocation of financial assistance to different activities. Separate agreements are signed for each project.

The state government covers the cost of infrastructure and provides machinery and equipment for the workshops, as well as building materials for the core development. The municipalities secure the land and implement public works.

government initiatives to reduce poverty and crime relationship

The educational institutions contribute training in construction methods. Community associations are organized in each project area and they manage a community fund. Title to the land is initially transferred by the municipality to the community association. Later, the community association can grant ownership rights to members in good standing for five or more years. Members of the Comunidades are drawn from the adjacent favelas.

They are usually poor families living in shared accommodations. They contribute to hours of sweat equity for the construction of their houses and community facilities.

The job creation component is a cornerstone of the Comunidades concept. The workshop producing building materials and prefabricated components for housing construction is the first component built on the site. It anchors an activity zone where micro-enterprises can be started by residents in the Comunidades and adjacent favelas. A credit line established by the state government provides entrepreneurs with seed capital and working capital.

Community associations review and guarantee the applicants, and an intermediary NGO manages the program. Households may apply for a maximum of three loans for the same property. The municipal subsidy, initially equivalent to 30 percent, is progressively phased out and offset by increasing contributions from the borrowers.

Comunidades introduced concepts that have become the hallmark of successful initiatives today, including partnerships among local stakeholders, interlinked programs, integrated strategic initiatives, and community management of activities.

From actors to partners, an evolution in parallel with decentralization In support of their advocacy of decentralization, international and bilateral development organizations have emphasized the need to strengthen the role and capabilities of local governments and channel funding to the local level.

In the process they have tempered their marked preference for creating special entities and institutional arrangements to implement the programs they fund. They may and often do request recipient local governments to establish within the municipal organizational framework appropriate structures to guide and monitor program implementation. Paralleling this evolution, central governments have been enjoined to progressively withdraw from direct interventions and involvement in the daily operations of programs.

Instead, they are acting in a supportive role, channeling to localities and communities the inputs they need in terms of funds, technical and material resources to assist them in the execution of public works and the operation of programs.

Similarly, local authorities are encouraged to draw on the efficiencies and financial capacity of the private sector for specific program components, and to delegate CBOs with responsibilities for community organizing and management of activities.

Initiatives aiming to improve the lives of slum dwellers and alleviate poverty among vulnerable groups most often receive earmarked transfers from national and international donors, who exercise some oversight. These initiatives require intergovernmental coordination, clear definition of responsibilities, and smooth interface with communities and households. Proper structure tends to evolve over time as the actors involved gain experience and redefine their roles. The evolution from actor to partner requires a change in institutional culture as well as in procedures.

In countries with high levels of decentralization, central agencies have accomplished this shift. The examples summarized below illustrate this evolution in countries undergoing rapid and profound political, economic, and social change.

government initiatives to reduce poverty and crime relationship

Drawn from different contexts and cultures, they highlight the common features of recent trends. The concept of services is broadly defined and allows the program to fund all categories of infrastructure, many community facilities, as well as building the capacity of municipalities to manage the services they deliver. The program is structured to contribute to six strategic objectives: Upgrading the living environment and promoting social equity. Integrating divided urban areas.

Training and employing local entrepreneurs, contractors, and workers, with special emphasis on women and youth. Providing bulk infrastructure to support the development of housing housing construction is funded by a separate program.

It is primarily oriented to reach poorer urban and rural communities, as reflected in the criteria for the allocation of funds: This program is designed as a partnership between the national government, the provincial government, the municipalities, and the communities.

All funding requests must be initiated by the communities. Municipalities prioritize the requests, and provincial governments review their eligibility and submit the proposals to the national government. The grants are disbursed to the community through the municipality. Municipalities and provincial governments can and do supplement the grants with funds from their own budgets. Structured for geographic outreach and speed of delivery, the program completed 2, projects with more under construction and in the design stage as of June To meet this more ambitious mandate, the program budget was increased from In view of the impressive performance achieved since then, the budget has steadily grown: Dynamic local leaders are now able to mobilize their communities and tap the resources provided by national funds to promote local development and improve the lives of families living in slums and squatter settlements.

InKlapmuts was the most disadvantaged community in the municipality of Stellenbosch.